Showing posts with label education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts

Saturday, January 9, 2021

Energy Futures Won't Explode

It's story time. 

Once upon a time, I was on my High School Debate Team. We played in the Policy Debate format, meaning we were divided into teams of two, I had a partner, and there was one topic, or resolution, for the entire season. Each team prepared to either agree with the resolution and argue to affirm it, or disagree and argue to uphold the status quo. The debate is structured around four 8 minute speeches, one given by each team member, each speech rebutted by a 4 minute cross examination, and then closed with a 4 minute rebuttal closing speech. The debate is mediated and judged by an impartial debate judge, usually an adult/teacher. 

In the late 90's the National Policy Debate Resolution one year was as follows: 

That the Federal Government Should Establish a Policy to Substantially Increase Renewable Energy Use in the United States


My partner and I were both first year debaters. We were persuaded to debate as the Affirmative Team. There are some advantages to that. The Affirmative Team goes first in the debate structure. We get to define the terms of the resolution, and set the agenda for what will be debated and what can be challenged by the other side. Not only does the Affirmative Team have to show why the resolution should be adopted, but also create a plan for implementation. In contrast, the Negative team has to address and defeat each of the opposition's assertions for necessity, but also cast the plan in doubt. 

We set to work establishing our argument. While researching renewables, we ran into a few obscure articles on hydrogen fuel cells. At the time, the use of hydrogen fuel had barely begun to make a resurgence, long abandoned after the '40s. The papers, articles, and anecdotes we were able to collect told a story of a very real possibility of a clean burning fuel source, theoretically renewable, able to fully supplant coal and oil in fixed point power plants, but also theoretically replace gasoline in transportation. 

Our plan... 1: Hydrogen captured, burned for energy 2: waste water then collected and split using energy from solar farms. 3: Hydrogen recaptured , burned for energy 4: rinse. repeat. 

The arguments against were predictable. 

What about the waste water? Physically speaking, combustion happens when a substance is ignited, it combines with oxygen and burns, releasing energy. Hydrogen + Oxygen = H2O and nothing else. We found proof that hydrogen fuel waste water was safe enough to drink. 

Where does the energy come from to split the water back into hydrogen and oxygen? Solar power cells at the time would not be able to yield the power needed on a small scale for the continuous electrolysis needed to split molecules. Also, solar battery storage at the time was not good. However, as the Resolved points out, we only need to argue for policy change, and eventually the research and investment will yield future technology. Our sources predicted with proper investment, solar and hydrogen technologies would make leaps in the next 10 to 20 years. 

The biggest set back? Public opinion. 

You see... at the turn of the 20th century, rigid airships were newly engineered transport vessels. These vessels were created from massive fixed metal frames which housed ballasts filled with lighter than air gases, allowing for flight. Helium was the preferred gas used for these things, but due to helium shortages and US trade embargoes, hydrogen became a substitute, despite being more volatile. 

If anyone has some of these stamps, let me know

This volatility became a real public issue when, in 1937, the Hindenberg caught on fire at the Lakehurst Naval Yard in New Jersey. The incident was widely broadcast, famously by Herbert Morrison from WLS Chicago, and documented by newsreel footage. The newsreels, still photographs, and radio broadcast are even now easily recognized. 36 people lost their lives.


As a consequence, zeppelin technology was abandoned, and would have been eclipsed by passenger jet aircraft anyway. Hydrogen as a fuel would suffer the same fate, despite several other issues and factors contributing to the deadliness of the accident.

Anyway, my partner and I understood the easy arguments to dismiss hydrogen as dangerous and outdated, and we worked hard to find information to counter these biases born more than 60 years ago and reinforced by every high school history textbook ever since. 

The gas itself is no more flammable, or combustible than gasoline, and materials used to store this material are far advanced compared to 1930s technology. And, speaking of technology, just like solar tech, these things will also develop over time and become safer and more user friendly. 

During the debate season, we fared pretty well. Not many Negative Teams had prepared to argue against such an obscure fuel source plan. When we were mediated and judged by impartial judges, we usually won. 

Read that again.... "When we were mediated and judged by IMPARTIAL judges...."

Despite the rules for hearing and judging debates, we still ran into judges that awarded the debate to the other side simply due to the fact that they couldn't get past hydrogen as being dangerous and impractical, even when the Negative Team failed at arguing and winning that point based on the rules. Keep in mind, these judges were all either public school teachers, or debate league volunteers, not our high school peers. 

Yes, this still makes me salty. It's been 20 years and I'm still mad. 

Lately, though, my partner and I have been vindicated. 

I have been finding more and more articles from Popular Mechanics, SciTech Daily, and other science and engineering publications about hydrogen fuel cell innovations. In fact, one article, by Fuel Cell Works, specifically details the kind of water splitting fuel cells we hypothesized. 

Below are some more linky links. As you can tell, I'm proud of my teenage self for predicting the future. Also, this is my big F U to those biased judges of the past. 

Fuel Cells Works






Salt Cave Storage



Nanotech Materials



Sunday, June 30, 2019

Thanks for the Memories


I posted about the State of Maine banning American Indian mascots entirely, in name and symbol. Apparently this is the first state to do so, following California's partial ban that targeted the name Redskins exclusively.

Following this event, a middle school in Ohio is also contemplating a name change. While this is not that eventful on its own, I think the coverage is interesting. The masthead above has the link (click it). Also, linked here....



The school appears to be moving in the right direction, but, like with all institutions fearing public backlash, they're being cautious and seeking public opinion first by survey. Apparently majority consensus determines wrong or right. Imagine Lincoln issuing a survey before signing the Emancipation Proclamation.

The story tries to show both sides of the issue. Predictably, the reasons for keeping the mascot are limited to tradition, keeping it "just for the memories". Nostalgia isn't a reason to even have a mascot to begin with. Keep in mind, this particular story involves a middle school, not a high school or university, or professional club.

There are younger people interviewed expressing need for change, and of course, older people who want the mascot to stay. All people interviewed are beyond Middle School age, by the way, and one woman is 71 years old. I wonder what actual middle school students think about the issue. I know, it's a crazy idea, asking the group most affected by this symbol (even if they're affected at all).

Hopefully, the White Oak middle school, and the City of Cincinnati will do the right thing.

Some ideas for the future....

Cincinnati has several nicknames, some more old school than others. But... Queen City, Blue Chip City, and Porkopolis can lend themselves to some pretty cool mascot ideas.

School Mascots derived from Porkopolis would be the most fun
https://www.designevo.com/create/logos/pig.html

Friday, March 8, 2019

One by One, Change will Come

Up until recently, the State of Maine had one remaining high school with an American Indian mascot. Skohegan is the county seat of Somerset County, the Skowhegan Regional school district services 5 other neighboring communities. The Press Herald published the following story earlier this week about a press release from Maine's Department of Education. The link is below.


The history of Maine and tribal relations revolves around a series of wars with the Wabanaki Confederacy. By 1725, the 4th Anglo-Abenaki War ended with the native population of the Somerset area either pushed out or massacred. This history, like most American relationships with local tribes, makes using the mascot far more uncomfortable.


Later in the week, Skowhegan held a meeting to discuss the mascot. Apparently, the meeting concluded with a resolution to discontinue the name. The story is below, reported by the local ABC affiliate. The State of Maine no longer has American Indian mascots in their schools.


Friday, October 27, 2017

Purple Hairy Elephants!

Awhile ago, I wrote about Amherst College, and their recently solved dilemma regarding their problematic namesake, Lord Jeffery Amherst. The college had publicly severed ties with the unofficial mascot, and adopted their first official mascot, the mammoth.

On October 20, 2017, they announced their official mascot design/logo. It's pretty cool. I posted it below. This is a follow up to this blog post right here.


Friday, July 14, 2017

Symbols Mean Things

As human beings, I think personal identity is an important thing. It is why religion is so important and why we create exclusive clubs, and put so much importance in professional sports and local high school athletics. In the United States, this idea of personal identity, answering the question "who am I?" is wound up in the dual question of "what is America?"

We tend to answer these questions with a variety of easily accessible categories with easily displayable symbols and themes. For example, an Irish Catholic American hockey fan from Boston may display shamrocks, rosaries and crosses, Boston Bruins logos, and American flags to show pride in his identity. The definition of a person, therefore, can be displayed in a series of recognizable logos, designs, colors, and symbols.

The one problem with summing up personal identity through symbols is when anti-intellectualism begins to blur the lines between what the signifier wants to say about himself, and what the symbols are actually signifying. A very good example is the redneck culture clinging to the Confederate Battle Flag as a symbol of freedom, good ole boy country living, and Southern Pride, when in fact it is a symbol of armed treason against the United States in response to northern states pushing for an end to slavery.

In response to this, I often find myself saying things like "that doesn't mean what you think it means", mostly to myself when I see stupid memes, or bumper stickers and flags hung from houses (or the backs of pick-ups). Here are some other examples...


Before I start, and before I get a large amount of hate mail from keyboard cowboys, I do understand how difficult being a police officer can be, or any public authority figure, for that matter. Most police officers are good people, I'm sure. Realistically, not every cop out there is a terrible person. Generalizations are indefensible. This isn't a police-bashing post.

This particular flag is used, presumably, to show support for law enforcement. Lately, it has been popping up probably in response to the Black Lives Matter movement. I personally do not see why it would be necessary unless you feel the need to show how much you don't support Black Lives Matter. But, let's just assume the person flying this flag really does support the police with no other agenda or desire to signify something else entirely.

The symbol, as shown above, is a combination of the flag of the United States of America, and the Thin Blue Line. The Blue Line is an analogy coined in the UK. Specifically, the police are the thin blue line separating civilization from anarchy.

On the surface, combining the two symbols together appears to be an homage to American law enforcement. However, I would argue it is a symbol advocating for martial law, one nation under the thin blue line. The American flag is a symbol of the Republic. and the Thin Blue Line is a symbol of Law and Order. Put them together and you have a symbol for a Law and Order Republic.

The emergence of the popularity of this symbol in conjunction with the Black Lives Matter movement aimed at police reform, ending racial profiling, and holding the police accountable seems more than mere coincidence. If the response to the goals of Black Lives Matter is to throw blind support behind law enforcement, the only conclusion that can be made is they support an untethered, self regulating law and order establishment, in short, an America ruled by an overbearing authority.

It's either that, or just plain old American racism.

I hate this symbol. I have a problem with any home made sign or bumper sticker telling me what to do. But this one I find extremely problematic. Perhaps it is just a cute way for parents to show everyone else driving behind them that they just had a baby, and they're super proud of it. I suppose that is a weird way to show narcissism. 

What I see, though, is a yellow street sign. Diamond shaped yellow traffic signs designate caution. They are posted to give warning to drivers with the expectation of slower, more cautious driving. So, this placard then would mean "there is a baby in my backseat, you all need to drive more careful". 

I call bullshit. First of all, don't tell me what to do, you aren't the traffic commision. Second of all, I didn't decide to have a kid, you did. it's your responsibility to keep it safe, not everyone else's. No one should be expected to modify their lives because you wanted a family. Third, your choice to procreate is a terrible reason for me to want to drive safe. I already figured out while driving I can only control my own driving, and no one else's. I have my own reasons to not drive like an idiot, I don't need your reasons also. 

Just as an aside, I also hate those "drive like your kids live here" signs, or those neon plastic children that look like they're about to jump into traffic. I am driving like your kids live there, like a normal driver not worrying about stupid little people running into traffic. Be a parent, keep them out of the street. Also, those plastic children are a distraction. 


This is a pile of poo. Let's get that out of the way real quick. It's not whipped chocolate frosting, or soft serve ice cream. This emoji is the shit. Literally. Like all things seized by pop culture, this thing has been put on all sorts of merchandise, including plush hats. I don't just mean the emoji is embroidered or reproduced on a hat. The hat is a giant poop that you can put on your head. I've seen kids wearing them. This means they probably got them from their parents, who either don't know what it is (plausible), or are okay with their kids walking around as literal shit-heads (actually, that is pretty hilarious). 



As a recap, conclusion, closing, or whatever, I'd like to see more people take time to understand the things they are trying to say, or advertising with the symbols they choose to promote, as unambiguously as possible. It's probably too much to ask at this point, but a little time and research into things could save a few dirty looks from the public. We don't all have to be Professor Langdon to understand symbolism, just take a few minutes to Google some things. 

Friday, April 21, 2017

Another Win for American Indians and Prehistoric Mammals!


http://athletics.amherst.edu/landing/index
The other day Amherst College announced a change to their school mascot. Previously, the college apparently had no official mascot, but Lord Jeffrey Amherst was considered an unofficial mascot. Amherst College claims to have the oldest collegiate athletics department in the United States, and competes in the NCAA division III as part of the Little Three in the New England Small College College Athletic Conference.


The college, founded in 1821 in Amherst, Massachusetts, was technically named after the town. However, the town was named for Lord Jeffrey Amherst, First Baron Amherst, hero of the Seven Years War, known in the United States as the French and Indian War. Afterward, he was appointed Governor-General of British North America.

As Governor-General, Lord Jeff oversaw the defense against Pontiac's Rebellion. The controversy stems from his suggestion in 1763 to use smallpox as a biological weapon against Pontiac's allies. This has been historically preserved through a letter chain between him and his subordinate Colonel Henry Bouquet. The letters express not just a desire to eliminate combatants, but to "extirpate this execrable race".


The town of Amherst has also wrestled with its namesake, and there have been petitions to change the town's name as well. Even though Lord Jeff had put his stamp on the region (Amherst, MA is not the only place to bear his name in the Northeast), his legacy as a war hero is tarnished by his participation in passive genocide.

Amherst College, however, has indeed decided to take steps to distance themselves from Lord Jeff and his history with Indian extermination. There is a hotel on campus that bore Lord Jeff's name, and that too will be renamed, according to Cullen Murphy of the Amherst board.

As before there appears to not have been an official Amherst College mascot, now the school has adopted one. The Beneski Museum of Natural History on campus has a complete mammoth skeleton, unearthed by Amherst professor Fredrick Loomis in 1913. And so, Amherst begins a new chapter, with a new official mascot, the Amherst Mammoth. Congratulations!

A quick google search for "mammoth mascot logos" proves mammoths could be potentially terrifying. There are a few mammoth mascots already. The Colorado club from the National Lacrosse League and HC Ugra from the KHL both use the Mammoth, and also the Omaha franchise from the now defunct FXFL were the Mammoths. Both Tufts and Alabama have elephant mascots, which are almost the same thing. All of these examples lead me to believe the newly chosen mascot has potential. I look forward to seeing Amherst College's new identity unfold in the coming months.

Thursday, March 9, 2017

California Redskins: an Update


Awhile ago, I wrote about Governor Brown from California signing a law to ban the Redskins mascot from all California schools. At the time, there were still four schools left in the state that used the mascot. Go here for that original blurb. It's at the end of this piece on Lancaster, NY. Also, smash that CalSchoolNews banner for this new follow-up article.

As an update, the time is officially up for those four California schools. What did they choose to do?

Gustine High decided to do what many other schools have done in the last few decades, and opt for identifying as a color or colored animal in place of racism. They are now The Reds, and use a stylized letter G as a logo/symbol. Well done!

Calveras High School has preferred to "stick it to the man" by removing their Redskins name and replacing it with nothing. Sort of. They still use their Indian iconography. This does follow the mandate, but exploits a loophole that pretty much undermines the whole point of the mandate to start with.

Speaking of missing the point, the remaining two schools, Cowchilla and Tulare Union changed their mascots also, per the law. They both identify as The Tribe now, and both unsurprisingly have also kept their Indian iconography.

So, really, only Gustine understood the point of this excercise.

No one believes change will come easy, especially with regards to generations old allegiances to mascots important to adolescent athletics. This is still a step in the right direction, and eventually even the iconography will change.

Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Speak no Evil, Hear no Evil

There has been much talk lately of college campuses becoming overly sensitive politically correct nightmares. From a humanist utilitarian perspective, this is difficult to believe. There is such a thing as being too open and accepting? But with comedians like Seinfeld admitting why they don't play schools anymore, and stories of the hijacking of the Trigger Warning note, and stories of students speaking out against insensitivity for seemingly innocuous statements, this has become a serious question, and has put Freedom of Speech back into the national conversation.

Before I continue further, let me make it very clear, there is a huge difference between this particular issue of free speech and overly sensitive PC police, and the need to combat actual racism and misogyny.

I had a conversation with a good friend of mine the other day about this same issue. She stated that even though sexism is very pervasive in our society and has become toxic, pointing out every single instance in her life would be exhausting, and attacking people (men mostly) for "mansplaining" can be counter productive and no longer effective. She has since picked her battles, understanding the differences between intentional marginalizing comments and actions, and ones that are perfectly reasonable and steeped in cultural normative has made being an active feminist far less stressful.

This doesn't mean women ought to stop shaming men for things like catcalling. In fact, getting creative with it like Elana Adler's project You are my Duchess not only brings the issue to the public, but the humor helps lessen the damage done by these vulgar assaults. As she points out on the website, at first, these cross stitches are cute and funny, but after awhile you realize these are actual things actually shouted out in public from one stranger to another. The whole collection becomes a disgusting monument to what many women deal with on a daily basis. These are the battles worth having, this is not the problem.

http://www.elanaadler.com/index.php?/other-work/you-are-my-dutchess/
less exhausting, and no mansplaining necessary

Our problem of overly protective, political correct schools is not the same issue as gender inequality, or institutional racism. It perhaps is born of both of these larger societal issues, but has since outpaced these movements into something resembling a satire. For example, at Brown, the Sexual Assault Task Force was created to make Brown a safe place for victims of rape and abuse. This is necessary to help these people cope with their trauma and normalize in an accepting community. However, the task force promotes the use of safe spaces, where students can retreat when speakers and debates become too overwhelming. The problem happens when students use the safe spaces not to withdraw and recover from PTSD-like symptoms, but to escape having to engage in competing viewpoints. The New York Times Sunday Review has a full article about that here.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/opinion/sunday/judith-shulevitz-hiding-from-scary-ideas.html?_r=0
links to the article too

The Right, of course, has linked these issues together to try and undercut Liberals, and try and show that the status quo is fine. We don't have to have serious conversations about Race or Gender, because it's just the Left over reacting. An interview between Rachel Martin of Listen to the Story on NPR and Jamelle Bouie of Slate basically sums this up. Bouie states that this desire to protect Freedom of Speech has minimized the Americans who are trying to stand up and fight to be welcome and accepted in systems that are predominately white and male.

http://www.npr.org/2015/11/15/456094129/college-campuses-call-for-safe-spaces
click me

At some point in the last decade, the necessary considerations for equality, and acceptance in educational places took a weird turn. Instead of protecting freedoms of expression and speech in a move to be more open and welcoming to minority groups, colleges have pandered to students' entitlement.

I find this whole thing interesting. Professional comedians like Seinfeld aren't refusing to perform on college campuses because they don't believe in civil rights, or feminism. It has more to do with the way in which the college population responds to perceived slights, either real or imaginary. Part of what makes comedy far more important than just funny cartoon antics, is the ability to have thought provoking conversations wrapped up in jokes. A comedian is able to have those embarrassing, uncomfortable conversations about the difficulties of life, because they're cloaked in comedy. Just like Ms Adler's confrontation with abusive catcalling is wrapped up in needlework. But if a campus has banned topics of feminism, racism, violence, and addiction because they may offend the student body, how can the comedian bring a voice, and a cathartic relief to his audience?

The way in which campuses are dealing with these issues has missed the point. The student body is no longer interested in what is best for the entire student body. This is no longer about feminists wanting equality, or minorities wanting acceptance. Feminism and cultural acceptance aide in the educational system and benefit everyone. The focus has shifted from what is best for education, to what is best for that individual. If colleges refuse to have conversations about certain "trigger" topics, how can their students with these issues perceived or real find cathartic relief and grow stronger and more confident? And, to go one step further, the group as a whole will be better educated and more welcoming and accepting.

These students that call out their peers and professors for insensitive remarks in exaggerating, over the top ways seem to do it, not because it helps inform the perceived aggressor, or to help reclaim lost dignity or stop oppression, but rather because the spotlight is now on them.

Children behave without an understanding of other people. They are unable, at the moment, to empathize. These students seem to behave that way. When something seems to disrupt their perception of their universe, and make them uncomfortable it is made offensive and demonized. Empathy is something learned, and is very important to cultivating a culture of acceptance.

I think, as a society, we often forget that college-aged kids are not yet adults. We want them to be fully functioning grown ups capable of making good, rational decisions and participating in real life society. They can vote, they can serve in the military, they can be prosecuted for crimes as adults. But really, 18-22 year olds don't behave like people in their late 20s, or 30s, or like their parents. If the goal is to promote a safe learning environment for all students in a caring and accepting culture, then we have to promote certain conversations built to teach empathy, no matter how uncomfortable those conversations may be.



Tuesday, May 15, 2012

American (history) Lies


I'll just leave this here.  It's from Cracked.com, which is a blog that loves to publish articles in the form of listed items...  usually the 5 or 10 or whatever number of some nerdy theme.  Sometimes they publish interesting things, like this article about the Monkey Sphere.

The specific article I want to talk a little bit about today though, is titled the 6 Ridiculous Lies You Believe about the Founding of America.  The title is a little misleading, as the 6 items are actually more about the 6 lies we (Americans) believe about American Indians, the discovery of America, and Pilgrims, not so much about the founding of the United States of America.  Either way, this article can be placed in the history category and highlights some of the same sorts of things Howard Zinn, and James Loewen have been talking about for years.

This of course is more of the same in a recurring theme around here, the misinterpretation of facts used to prop up the status quo, oppression, etc.  When I hear people (politicians, talking heads, media,  angry protesters, etc) talking about old school American values, founding fathers, and what this country should stand for, I think back to things like this article.  If people are unaware of the real truths behind the history of the "new world" what else have we been lead to believe about the rest of our collective history?  Also, Vikings!  Who doesn't like Vikings?


Saturday, June 4, 2011

Time out for Education

For a while now ignorance and stupidity have been glorified in America, and it needs to stop. I started to realize this phenomenon in middle school. It became not a good idea to have all the correct answers, cool to feign ignorance, and okay to be proud or indifferent of bad grades. Perhaps I had teachers who were also indifferent of how their students viewed accomplishment. Perhaps low self esteem lent itself to falling into poor peer pressure. Perhaps marketing and entertainment at the time showed us all to aim low and be proud of it. Whatever the reasons, the damage had been done and mediocrity and blatant ignorance have become acceptable.

I can't blame it all on these guys, though
And this was in the 1990s. By now, since it doesn't appear that anything has changed, this particular culture of failure has had time to grow. What happens when an entire generation embraces mediocrity and is okay with imperfect academic skills? When being educated does not necessarily equal economic success, why bother? Remember when it was necessary to graduate from high school and earn a BA to get a good paying job? Remember when a masters degree meant a large annual salary? Remember when you realized that people without these things could make just as much or more than you and not have college debt?

What happened?

We now live in an era when people who make an impact socially and culturally can come from anywhere, thanks mostly to the internet and reality television. Sarah Palin is a good example of someone who has no business being anywhere near impressionable people. I saw this on the news recently, which made me angry:



You would think that anyone in public life, especially politicians, and even more so governors (even ex-governors) would need to know basic US History. I would hope that anyone within earshot of this news would toss out any ideas of possibly supporting her. This is basic US history, not obscure details and policies studied by stuffy history PhDs in tweed jackets. This is essential national mythos. Paul Revere's ride is legendary Americana, and Palin presumably graduated from high school without knowing. She was somehow elected as governor of a state, and ran as veep on the GOP ticket.  I'm willing to bet Dan Quayle knows about the lamps in Old North, even though he doesn't know that Latin Americans speak Spanish and Portuguese, and not Latin. The sad thing is, this episode of ignorance will most likely be swept under a rug somewhere, and people will continue to support the GOP's weakest link.
but she's such a milf!
Palin is very good at brushing aside ignorance and being proud of her misconceptions and blatant inaccuracy. She defended herself by claiming the question was unscripted, and she gave the best answer she could without any prep. Why would you need to prep for a third grade history question?I'm not sure either.

History is not the only thing overlooked. Grammar and spelling have both taken their hard knocks. Apparently it is acceptable now to use the made up words gotten, and funner in professional settings, such as legal, academic, and government writing. Just so we're all clear: funner is wrong, its a modern bastardization. The correct comparative is more fun. Technically, fun shouldn't be used as a normal adjective at all, only as an attributive. But if you must, than more and most ought to be used. Anyone who tells you different is making excuses for using bad grammar. And I don't much care for dictionaries adding words to enable these poor speakers (see Merriam/Webster).

Secondly, gotten isn't technically wrong, but it is old, and awkward, and lazy. There are always better words to use in its place (obtain, become, moved, managed), it is not to be used to show possession (receive).

Also, the rise of texting and instant messaging in America has destroyed proper spelling and given rise to misspelled words, and phonetic spelling. Examples are substituting d for th, double o for hard u, combining words like going to into single words (gonna), and using numbers and letters to represent actual words like 2 instead of to or too, and r and u instead of are and you. Also, could of may sound like could've when you're speaking, but it actually makes no sense, and could have is actually correct.

Regardless of how you feel about proper grammar, or the facts of American History, the trend recently in government is to slash social budgets dramatically. This means, in short, that public education is in jeopardy. No matter how you feel about social spending, or public education in general, the majority of US citizens are publicly educated through high school. The fact that money is not going to public education, and budgets are unable to pay for the things that education specialists (the dudes with PhDs that spent their whole lives studying this stuff) say are needed for quality education means things will get worse. National trends in bad grammar and poor knowledge of history may not be that big of a deal, but if students haven't a grasp of those things, how can they possibly master critical thinking skills, good study habits, and effective reading and writing skills? Will our future as a nation be politicians that not only can not get their US history correct, but also can not read or write?

I found this poem by Taylor Mali, and it basically sums up my whole post and then some.  Enjoy.
Totally, like, whatever, you know?

Monday, February 1, 2010

What Books do you Teach?

Why is literature important? This question was posed in my class recently. This was my answer...

There are basically two kinds of classes in school.
  1. Math/Science
  2. Social Studies/Language Arts

Both types of classes foster the same basic principles. They teach insight and knowledge into certain aspects of life, solve certain types of problems, and teach certain skillsets. 


So, while Math/science classes teach logic, reason, hard evidence, solutions to concrete problems with concrete answers, the Humanities department teaches social, emotional, and personal solutions to ethical, moral, philosophical problems. 

This department is called Humanities for a reason. It offers lessons and answers on what it means to be human. Franz Kafka said "we have need of books which act upon us with a misfortune from which we would suffer terribly... a book must be the axe that smashes the frozen sea within us". 
The goal for humanities then, is to find that axe. 

Jeffrey Wilhelm has decided that the goal of teaching literature should be about fostering maturity.  He states, "Maturity entails, first, the recognition that you have a unique perspective and a view of the world that has value, and second, the recognition that there are different perspectives in the world and that these have value and are worth knowing about". He goes on further to state that reading can be a social experiment that allows us to share meaning.



In Math and Science, we constantly have to find the value of X. But in Humanities, we try and find the value of self, followed by the value of everyone else. 

Therefore, a good literature classroom should foster social interaction. Literature should foster discussion, dissent, collaboration, teamwork, debate. Empowering the student to take charge of the learning process and build good learning habits and a willingness to seek out knowledge and meaning should be the goal for every literature classroom.

There is a huge discussion in contemporary education about what sorts of materials should be used to teach the above skills. There are a number of books considered classics in the school curriculum which are easily recognized and are taught often. Much has been said of this "canon" of literature, and questions arise as to the validity of these books over other "alternative" or contemporary texts.

I think there are a number of other reasons why teachers now are moving away from the literary "canon"
  1. the books we read in school as students are not always looked fondly on. I still cringe when I hear "Johnny Tremain". 
  2. it is way more exciting and interesting for teachers to teach new and interesting texts, authors, and genres. 
  3. it is very easy to gain students attention with the latest things then with anything that can be perceived as old.
However, the needs of the student should be placed above the desires of the teacher. Sometimes Johnny Tremain needs to be taught, no matter how much it pains the teacher.

So I have a few recommendations for the middle school reading curriculum. These are some books that will help open perspectives as well as deal with some very basic questions on ethics, and social norms, as well as looking at things from different perspectives:
Lord of the Flies
Bell Jar
The Giver
Outsiders
Animal Farm
The Absolutely True Diary of a Part Time Indian
April Morning
To Kill a Mockingbird
In the Time of Butterflies
Romeo and Juliet
As I Lay Dying
Diary of a Young Girl (Anne Frank)
Little Prince
Heart of Darkness
There are some that would complain that these books have been taught before and don't give a fresh contemporary perspective on adolescence. and I strongly disagree. The themes that can be pulled from these novels are many and varied and are still very much relevant without being crass, inappropriate or too mature. 

Another complaint to teaching older traditional texts is that they are too difficult.

Boo hoo.

Some of these books are complex and can be challenging. I suppose if students would benefit from a molly-coddling teacher and never be challenged in the classroom in any way, then go ahead, teach something easier. I'm sure those students will receive an education just as rewarding. 

I think if anything, the central themes deal with differing perspectives and lives. and all have central figures making big choices dealing with social expectations, obligations, and social norms. Growth. change. adversity... Humanities.  

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Reading is... fun!

Recently, I entered into the debate on teaching models for language arts skills. More specifically, how do we teach reading most effectively? The classic model, made famous by those ridiculous Hooked on Phonics works for me commercials, deals with building skills from the bottom (sounds) to the top (whole sentences).


In the 80's, these experts, Goodman and Smith, decided going the other direction would be better, as communication relies on whole meanings, not just parts of meaning. The concept is that regardless of one's basic knowledge of sounds, pronunciation, and vocabulary, comprehension should be the first thing studied, and then the basic things come second. This, of course, would never work in Kindergarten, but it is effective in high school.

However, because everyone is pretty familiar with Bottom-Up tactics, since everyone was taught that way, until the late 80's, teachers found themselves blending the two ideas and it has been decided that integrating the two is the best policy.

Another concept in mainstream teaching is the idea that everything has a meaning in literature and language, and therefore reading is an exercise in decoding the meaning. This is very much the way poetry is taught. The theory is called New Criticism, which i find ironic, because there is nothing new about it. New Criticism matches up nicely with a bottom-up approach to teaching reading also.

Of course there is another polarizing method to teaching reading. An aesthetic reading, instead of looking for the definite answer, one that clearly makes sense, and obviously was meant by the author, Teachers have students look into the text to create their own meaning based on their experiences, and the experiences of the author which are made known to the class through a lesson on biography. This is a wonderfully fun and creative idea, however, no matter what students come up with, some things just mean exactly what they were intended. For example, nothing by Sylvia Plath is ever going to be about pink ponies and rainbow flavoured sherbert.

The teaching landscape, however, is moving more towards open-ended interpretation, creative thinking, aesthetic readings, despite the demand for schools to prove success through high test grades.
However, because we I think, just by growing up, for the most part, in schools in the 80s,

This seems to be an ongoing issue for contemporary teachers and the professors and experts that teach them. Its nearly paradoxical. Clearly, the teacher teachers want to see more creativity, foster the love of learning, fight boredom in classrooms, and put some energy into lackluster lessons, however, the state needs to see data that shows how smart our students are. No one can measure accurately how much a student learns and retains through personal experiences. So we are left teaching to standards, measuring success through large tests that dont require creativity, or foster outside of the test learning, or care if one is bored and uninspired. as long as you pick the correct multiple choice answer. But learning is way more than test grades.

When I was in middle school, I learned more in one week at Nature's Classroom, for example, then I did the rest of the year in my language arts class. Or, at the very least, I remember more. Guess which experience was graded, and which wasn't.

I think too, that a lesson in discourse is almost a must when teaching aesthetics especially when doing MCAS prep. Just knowing that not all types of writing and language is proper for all situations may help differentiate between efferent answers and aesthetic answers. for example: the way we write in personal journals is not the same way we should write for term papers, or... a letter to my friend (or probably more likely text message) is not the same as a letter we would send with a job application. choosing to teach efferents or aesthetics without teaching the other would be a mistake.

Monday, July 27, 2009

Reversing the Damage: American Indian Education

The education of the American Indian cultural group requires significant historical and cultural awareness, as well as sensitivity and compassionate understanding. This cultural group is different from others in America simply because of its unique history. Due to the abuses regarding American Indian culture by the United States government and by religious groups, the education of American Indian culture has greatly suffered. It may be too injured to be completely reversed.

I will use the terms American Indian and Indian in this paper as opposed to the other frequently used term of Native American for two reasons. My paper is about the tribal people of North America, not to be confused with the people and culture of the nation of India, I have no fear that using the term Indian will be misconstrued for another culture.


The second reason: for so long Indians in America have been called Indians. Borgna Brunner writes, “For a time, using Native American signaled a progressive and enlightened consciousness, in much the same way that using Asian instead of Oriental does. Use of Indian struck some as out of touch, or worse—a mark of ignorance or bigotry” (Brunner). 

However, this is a term, like Indian, created by white men. A Department of Labor survey in 1995 showed that over 50% of the Native American population preferred being called American Indians (Koerner). Also, the Bureau of Indian Affairs has officially recognizes this term. Realistically, just as one would specify Korean or Chinese instead of the blanket term Asian, most American Indians would rather call themselves by their tribal name, such as writer N. Scott Momaday calls himself a Kiowa writer instead of American Indian writer. However, since I will be writing of more than one specific tribal group, the terms Indian or American Indian will suffice.

Culture: 

Due to the number of different tribes and the diversity found across American Indian peoples, I have chosen five distinct tribes to illustrate in this section: the first, from the Northeast, the six tribes of the Haudensaunee Nation, also known as the Iroquois; from the Southeast, the infamously mistreated Cherokee; from the Plains, the four branches of the Sioux people; from the Northwest, the Spokane; and lastly, from the Southwest, the Apache. These five different cultural groups have been picked largely for their diversity, historic relevance, and also the language groups in which they belong.

The Haudensaunee Nation is actually a confederacy of six smaller tribes. The Cayuga, Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Seneca, and Tuscarora are better known as the Iroquois, a name given by the French colonizers (https://www.haudenosauneeconfederacy.com/who-we-are). They share a common language, and built a government structure which became a blueprint used by the United States founding fathers to create the new American government (Waldman, 104). Each tribe had representatives known as Sachems, and they met in a neutral village among the Onondaga tribe where the Iroquois Grand Council would meet every year.

The Cherokee are best known in American history as the people moved by the government in what has been known as the Trail of Tears. The Cherokee shared the Iroquoian Language with their northern brethren, the Haudensaunee, but lived geographically in the Appalachian area of the eastern United States, stretching from present day Kentucky to what is now Alabama (Waldman, 47). 

The Cherokee are best known as the people that welcomed assimilation into American culture, but then were double crossed by that same culture. In 1828, a Cherokee girl wrote, “I think [the Cherokee] improve […] They have a printing press […] They come to meeting on Sabbath days. They wear clothes which they made themselves. Some though rude, have shoes and stockings. They keep horses, cows, sheep, and swine. Some have oxen” (Perdue, 20). The girl’s excitement bears witness to the first United States policy regarding Indians. 

It was Henry Knox, as secretary of war, who pressed for civilizing the Indians, and therefore making the nation peaceful and secure. He pressed for Indian tribes to be seen as foreign nations, making it easier for the United States to deal with them as foreigners, and not as citizens (Perdue, 28). Andrew Jackson signed into law the Indian Removal Act in 1830, and by 1838, the Cherokee were forcibly rounded up by Georgian state police and corralled in concentration camps before being moved to Oklahoma (Perdue, 59-116). The brutality of this event can be realized from a contemporary point of view by asserting "Andrew Jackson's death marches and massacres of indigenous people were inspiring to a young Adolf Hitler who utilized Jackson's treatment of indigenous peoples as a blueprint for Nazi Germany's treatment of the Jewish people” (Hegedus).

One of the more famous Indian tribes, and perhaps the culture most people identify when hearing the term American Indian, is the Sioux culture of the American plains. The Sioux share the Siouan language family. The Siouan language has three basic dialects: Lakota, Dakota and Nakota. An easy way to tell the difference is the use of the consonant sounds L, D, and N. The Sioux have four distinguishable branches. 

The most famous Teton Sioux have 7 smaller tribal groups or bands and use the Lakota dialect, the Santee have four bands and use the Dakota dialect, and lastly, the Yankton with only one band, and the Yanktonai with three both use the Nakota dialect (Waldman, 228). 

The nature of the plains forced the Sioux to adapt to a nomadic lifestyle. The arrival of the horse to North America revolutionized the Sioux economy and transportation. Before the Spanish introduced the horse, the Sioux people used dogs to hunt and transport equipment. Horses allowed the Sioux to follow the buffalo at will. Buffalo provided for the Sioux food, clothing, shelter and spirituality (Calloway, 3). 

A Lakota proverb claims “The Buffalo is our brother; he gives his flesh so that the people may live. The Buffalo is sacred” (Crow Dog, 11). Resistance to United States expansion has been made famous through portrayal of Sioux leaders Little Crow, Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse, and Red Cloud and the military conflicts known as Custer’s Last Stand and the Wounded Knee Massacre by literature, television and film.

The Spokane from the Pacific North West are part of the Salishan language group. Due to fur trading established through the Louis and Clark expedition, the Spokane had friendly relations with the United States until epidemics in the 1850s and settlers and miners broke the Walla Walla Treaty stressed the peace. As the buffalo were sacred to the Sioux, salmon are the equivalent to the Spokane.

Like the Sioux, the last group, the Apache of the southwest, have been made famous through modern media and through prominent chiefs Cochise and Geronimo. 

The Apache are part of the Athapascan language group, and divided into various bands by dialect. Apache groups could be found from New Mexico and Arizona to as far east as Kansas and Oklahoma. The Apache were nomadic, and thrived on hunting, gathering, and raiding the nearby Hopi and Zuni tribes which were not nomadic and thrived agriculturally. Very adaptable, some Apache bands developed farming of their own. Others, after acquiring horses, took up buffalo hunting as well.

Apache war bands raided and resisted European expansion since the late 1500s. However, Apache/American relations did not become hostile until the 1860s. The Apache resistance lasted into the 20th century. They are the last tribe to be conquered and the only tribe to never surrender (Waldman, 15-17).

American History X

The conflict between non Indian expansion and Indian resistance has already been touched upon in this paper. However, this needs to be clearly defined and looked at more closely. “The Indian Problem” as it has been known to United States policy makers of the last three hundred years, has gone through various stages of change. 

As mentioned before, the earliest policy regarded Indian people as savages needing to be assimilated and therefore safe from harming the American way of life. However, even though success seemed to be eminent, the Cherokee Nation being the best example, President Andrew Jackson pushed along the Indian Removal Act and started the new policy of containment and forced acculturation era of United States/Indian relations. Forcing the tribes to resettle was not the only way to make Indians accept the Removal Act. General Nelson Miles stated in 1865, “The buffalo, like the Indian stood in the way of civilization and the path of progress” (Smits, 333). 

After the Civil War, Sherman and Sheridan began using tactics they developed to fight the confederacy against the Indian tribes. Hunters were hired to hunt the buffalo to near extinction, neatly cutting the plains Indians off from their food source. Calloway writes, “Killing buffalo was easier than killing Indians” and more effective. Families began showing up at forts along the reservations for rations, there was no other food (Calloway, 123).

Colin G. Calloway writes, “the reservation functioned not only to deprive Indian tribes of valuable land, but also as crucibles of change designed to break down tribal culture and society […] American reformers felt it was necessary to eradicate Indianness […] ‘Kill the Indian and Save the Man’” (Calloway, 15). The plan was to make the Indian into a stationary, self supporting Christian. At this time, a new system was developed in the government to deal with Indian business. The hierarchy started with the Secretary of the Interior, who was in charge of the new Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), which controlled agents positioned on the individual reservations. This hierarchical power was supported by the US Military (Calloway). Thus began the destruction of the Indian culture.
In his introduction to his book On The Rez, Ian Frazier writes, “like many comfortable stories, the story of Indian destruction hides other stories that are less so. For starters, it leaves out that the destruction was, and is, actually worse than can be easily described” (Frazier, 7). Crow Dog writes of the winters of the 1880s on the reservation in Rosebud, South Dakota. He states, “The land left to us was the kind where nothing grows. On the Cheyenne reservation people were dying of hunger. At Rosebud only half the children survived. They were too weak to fight the whooping cough and diphtheria the white man had brought” (Crow Dog, 41).

Education:

Before the reservation, missionaries in the Americas had been living with the tribes, doing their best to bring Christianity to the Indian people. After the reservation, it was easier for churches to set up schools, and with government involvement, remove children to these boarding schools. The Board of Indian Commissioners policy towards Indian education was summed up thusly in 1880, “As a savage, we cannot tolerate him any more as a half civilized parasite, wanderer, or vagabond. The only alternative left is to fit him by education for civilized life” Prucha, 194). 

The off reservation boarding school was preferred over day schools on the reservation. These boarding schools could contain or “quarantine” the children from “the contaminating influences of their families. Parents who refused to send their children away to school were denied rations” (Calloway, 16). Children were taken by force by soldiers or Indian police. 

The most famous school, Carlisle Industrial School in Pennsylvania, became a model for other schools. The rigid military style detail, dress, and instruction to push American values. “When Indian children arrived at boarding school, they received new names to replace their traditional ones, stiff uniforms in place of native clothing, and a haircut. They ate a monotonous diet, endured harsh discipline, and followed daily routines designed to instill systematic habits” (Calloway, 16).

Leonard Peltier writes in Prison Writings about his boarding school experience in the early 1950s. “First thing after we got there, they cut off our long hair, stripped us naked, and doused us with powdered DDT. I thought I was going to die […] We had to speak English. We were beaten if we were caught speaking our own language (Peltier, 78).

Boarding schools became a hot bed for disease and suicide. The cemetery at Carlisle is a testament to the damage done by violence, racism and culture shock. “The military style discipline, forced use of English, and mental abuse that were commonplace in such places appalls our 20th century sensibilities (Calloway, 169).

It is interesting to note, that although these schools planned to train Indian children to be productive members of American society, few were able to leave the schools and become successful. Employment rates for Indians, educated or not, were never very high and job opportunities on poverty stricken reservations were few. Non Indian ideas of Indians would not permit these “assimilated” Indians to be more than savages (Calloway).

More recently the BIA has been responsible for providing public education to the reservations. Frazier makes it clear that “recently, the BIA has announced that a large number of its reservation school buildings are falling apart. Some buildings are in such bad shape that students have been injured in them” (Frazier, 89).

Reservation Life:

Sherman Alexie, a Spokane/Couer d’Alene Indian poet/novelist/and screenwriter, has made his career writing short fiction, poetry and novels about modern reservation life. His characters are from the Spokane reservations. He writes of a new broader Indian culture created on the reservations that has become common among all reservations. This new culture revolves around alcoholism, television, country music and basketball. 

One of Alexie’s characters tells of driving to a pow wow celebration: “we pulled into Wellpinit, another reservation town of torn shacks and abandoned cars. We found the pow wow grounds and stopped at the entrance. The Indian deputy, a cousin of the Tribal Police Chief or a councilman, leaned into our open window. ‘this here is a dry pow wow’, he said. ‘you don’t have any alcohol or drugs in the car, do you?’” (Alexie, 21). In this short paragraph, Alexie is able to show the poverty of the reservation, and the constant problem of substance abuse, as well as the difficulty in finding and keeping a job. Knowing someone is the only way to be employed.

Another Indian writer, Simon J Oritz, a Navajo, recounts a winter he spent on a reservation not his own. He writes, “Yesterday, we talked of commodity food. Indians, poor people, need to eat. You have to eat. Rations, welfare, no choice. […] My mother, my father always afraid of welfare, the government, the law, the state, and so they worked hard and borrowed against payday, which sometimes didn’t come” (Ortiz, 12).

Alcohol is a constant problem for reservations. The Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education publishes that “Class divisions have been used to show that alcoholism causes poverty, thereby exonerating an economic structure that exploits workers and maintains social and economic inequality” (Nikelly). With this in mind, American Indians have it worse with alcoholism because they already have no economic equality, and this will further to keep them in poverty. 

Frank Fool’s Crow is quoted in On the Rez by Ian Frazier as saying, “alcohol is the bitterest curse we have, and it has done more to weaken and destroy us than anything else. We had no strong drink […] before the white man came to our country. We didn’t need it then and we don’t need or want it now” (Frazier, 140). Most reservations have become dry counties, but alcoholism is still a very large and very real issue. Mostly because there aren’t enough programs or money for existing programs to help combat alcoholism (Frazier).

Religion:

Traditional American Indian religion is based in animism. Although different, tribal religions hold much in common. There is a oneness with the earth, a reliance on ceremony, music and dance to celebrate and come closer to whichever spirits or gods the tribal group believe.
The Sioux believed in a Great Spirit, to which all belonged and which provided for all of creation. Leonard Crow Dog, a Lakota medicine man from the Rosebud reservation in South Dakota tells the story of the White Buffalo woman, a story that explains the beginning of Sioux spirituality. Crow Dog credits this character as making his people “holy and taught them how to live […] She was mercy, she was grace, she was beauty” (Crow Dog, 2). When the white buffalo woman arrived, the people were hungry. Two men from the tribe were sent on a last desperate mission to find for their people any sort of game to sustain the tribe. While out on the plains, the two hunters dreamed of meeting this woman. At dawn, a white buffalo calf appeared before them and changed into a beautiful woman. She had with her “sage and her great gift to our people, the sacred pipe” (Crow Dog, 2). She instructs the two men to return empty handed to their people and prepare for her arrival.
She taught the people the seven sacred ceremonies: the sweat lodge for purification, the naming ceremony for child naming, the healing ceremony, the adoption ceremony for making new relatives, the marriage ceremony, the vision quest, and the Sun Dance ceremony for all the nation and all the people.

“After she had done all this, the woman took leave of the people […] As she walked away, the people saw her turning into a white buffalo calf, and also into a deer woman, and then into an elk woman. They also say that she turned into a buffalo of four different colors – black, dark brown, light yellow brown, and finally white – as she disappeared into the clouds” (Crow Dog, 4).

The 7 ceremonies are still accepted and practiced today by few spiritual leaders. The four colors mentioned by Leonard Crow Dog at the end, correspond to the four sacred directions which are symbolized on the Medicine Wheel. This story shows that even though the society is lead and protected by men, their oldest and most revered figures is a woman.

The medicine wheel is a good tool to teach rudimentary Indian philosophy. A big problem in boarding schools was getting Indian children to accept the linear logic of western thinking. A medicine wheel is a circle. The circle is bisected twice, making four sections. Each section is a different color, corresponding to the four sacred colors of the buffalo: brown, black, light brown and white. Each color has a direction. There are seven directions, North, South, East, West, up, down and center. 

Donald Lee Fixico explains circular thought this way in American Indian Mind in a Linear World: “If a circle is envisioned and items are placed within it, we realize that each item or element has a relationship with each other in a fixed order with-in the system. Such entities or particles should be respected and treated equally since they belong to the same universe […] One young native person concluded that ‘like the seasons changing in cycles every year and like night and day in a circular change, the circle of life includes all things” (Fixico, 45). This circular philosophy is shared across the board by Indian tribes is the most important factor in miscommunication between Indian and non Indian culture.

Dance is an important part of American Indian spirituality, and dance festivals, called pow wows, have become central to modern American Indian culture. W. Richard West, Jr. explains the importance of dance in his culture in the forward of Native American Dance: Ceremonies and Social Traditions. He states: “When I was six years old, my father made for my younger brother and me our first dance ensembles, complete with feather bustles, moccasins, buffalo-bone breast plates, bells, and head roaches. Realizing, perhaps, that at the time I was more enamored of the colorful fluffs on the bustles and the sounds I could make with one-inch bells strapped at my knees, my father took considerable care to explain why certain materials were used in the dance outfits, what they meant, and what their importance was in the Cheyenne Way. When he taught us the dances themselves—which included the Eagle, Shield, Buffalo, Round, Two-step, and War dances, among others—he paid equal attention to emphasizing the place of dance as ceremony rather than only as performance” (Heth). 

West is clear to point out that the dances themselves are not like the dances of other cultures, just for entertainment or exercise, but have ritualistic components. The dress is traditional, meaningful and tied in to the tribe and the ceremony. Many tribes have their own specific dances, but there are also universal dances. The modern pow wow has made some dance into competition, and pow wow dancers into rock stars.

The seventh spiritual ceremony for the Sioux is the Sundance. This ceremony revolves around a dance meant to bring a spiritual cleansing and rebirth for the nation. Sun Dancers sacrifice their pain for transcendent clarity. Leonard Peltier, the best known Sun Dancer, has this to say of the ceremony: “When you give your flesh, when you are pierced at Sun Dance, you feel every bit of that pain, every iota […] And yet there is a separation, a detachment, a greater mind that you become a part of, so that you both feel the pain and see yourself feeling the pain. And then, somehow, the pain becomes contained, limited. As the white hot sun pours molten through your eyes into your inner being, as the skewers implanted in your chest pull and yank and rip at your screaming flesh, a strange and powerful lucidity gradually expands in your mind. The pain explodes into a bright white light, into revelation (Peltier, 11). The festival surrounds itself around a central pole, to which the Sun Dancers have attached themselves, to suffer for the people.

In the 1880s a new ceremony was being taught by a Paiute prophet named Wovoka. This ceremony, the Ghost Dance, promised to return the land back to its rightful caretakers and make non Indians vanish. “Not all Indians embraced the new religion, but reports of Indian warriors dancing in circles in expectation of the disappearance of white men and the return of the buffalo alarmed authorities” (Calloway, 20). Paranoia on behalf of the US military and incidents between authorities and Sitting Bull ended in tragedy. In 1890, the 7th cavalry massacred two hundred men, women, and children at Wounded Knee, South Dakota where the ghost dance was being performed. The ghost dance would not be practiced again until the 1970s. During the 70s, the American Indian Movement (AIM) resurrected the ghost dance as a protest against BIA corruption, and FBI brutality. This culminated in a 71 day armed standoff between AIM and the FBI at Wounded Knee.

Part of the assimilation process required Indians to pick up Christianity. Peltier shares, “Everyone knew that if you were Catholic, or at least Christian, you got more government assistance. […] Gamma didn’t really get the spiritual relief she was seeking out of the Catholics’ religion. So she never stopped going to Indian Ceremonies” (Peltier, 73). In response to Christianity, in the early 20th century, the Native American Church was created by Quanah Parker. Parker was Comanche. From there it spread from reservation to reservation. The church combined Christian sacrament with native customs and spirituality. Peyote was used in ceremony to heighten spirituality and bring the people visions, giving them “new understanding. It gave them a new mind” (Crow Dog, 93).

Language:

Historically, the American Indian tribes had no written language. The surviving languages of the American Indian tribes have since adapted a written language using the alphabet and pronunciation used in English and Spanish. Before this everything was shared through the oral tradition, passed down from generations, and through a pictographic storytelling language.
Storytelling became a vehicle for sharing tribal history and forming tribal identity. Because of the nature of the oral tradition, the language and meanings adaptively change over time to reflect the people, history, and geographic area. Alexie likens Indian culture to a rubber band. Indian culture, he says, can only be stretched so far geographically. “With Native American culture, since everything is geographically based – the stories and myths are about that rock, that river – it’s not so much about how far the rubber band can go before it snaps, but more that there is a point where it no longer stretches”(Carroll, 22).

Pictography was a way to chronologically keep track of tribal history. On the plains, these were kept on buffalo hides, painted in natural pigments. These hides, called Winter Counts, recorded the tribe’s history. Each symbol corresponds to a different event within a season, with its own story and relevance to the tribe. The pictographs are aligned in a circular pattern, moving from the inside out in a counter clockwise manner and can hold decades of information (Calloway). Calloway writes of Winter Counts as being like other historical sources, they have “limitations: their chronology usually cannot be established without cross referencing to other sources; interpretation can vary considerably” (Calloway, 32).

Teaching English to American Indian students presents itself differently than any other culture group. Upon entering my research, the plan was to research the culture, and then explain learning strategies for this cultural group. What difficulties and challenges are there for this cultural group?
The difficulty with teaching American Indian students, they are different than any other minority group. The extent to which the culture has been forced to assimilate is unlike any other group. This group has not come to the United States willingly. American Indians have also not been forcibly moved from their cultural centers in a brutal diaspora either, leaving their culture and support network and native lands behind. It has not been willingly education or lack or education that has assimilated these people. It has been forced linguistic genocide. Language has been used as a vehicle to conquer, oppress, and force assimilation.

I think the most important thing to consider when teaching about American Indian culture with or without members of this culture group is bias. Lynn T. Diaz-Rico recommends a move away from a trivializing bias toward culture. She writes, “the sole cultural reference may be to holidays or food, or […] ethnic bulletin boards during certain times of the year” (Diaz-Rico, 287). In the case of American Indian education, the misstep would be towards portraying American Indians as not a contemporary minority group. Indians do not live in tipis, and hunt and gather to survive, and dress in buckskin loin clothes. American Indians on and off the reservation live as modern Americans; they dress in jeans and t shirts, drive pick-up trucks and watch sports center. American Indian students in the classroom live as any other student from any other cultural group.

Knowing how different the circular thought process is to the linear philosophy of learning will help reach American Indian students. Being aware of American Indian education historically, mistakes made in the past will not be repeated. Buffalo Bird Woman, a Hidatsa, wonders in Calloway’s Our Hearts Fell to the Ground, “How can any child grow up without play?” (Calloway, 168). She explained how, before boarding schools, Indian children learned through stories, rituals, mimicry, hands on experiences. The opposite would be how the old boarding schools were set up: rigid structure, memorization, dictation. Cornel Pewewardy, in his essay “Learning Styles of American Indian/Alaskan Native Students”, calls this Field Dependence. Basically, “the learners are holistic or global learners […] highly visual/spatial, integrative, relational, intuitive, and contextual” (Pewewardy, 116).

Leonard Crow Dog explains the tiyoshpaye, the extended family concept of the American Indian tribe. He states the tiyoshpaye as “all the people having a common grandfather or great grandfather: aunts, uncles, granddads, grandmothers, grandkids, cousins, nieces, nephews” (Crow Dog, 10). With this traditional view of community, Collaborative Learning as lined out by Diaz-Rico in Teaching English Learners seems a perfect way to engage students. Diaz-Rico writes that “cooperative grouping also increases the possibility that English learners will feel a part of the culture of the classroom as a whole” (Diaz-Rico, 357). Forging a learning community that all are a part of will fit into the cultural schema of the American Indian student. Group building and Collaborative Social Action can be strongly applied on the steady foundation of an accepting and functioning learning community. Pewewardy seems to agree with Crow Dog, he states, “although it is impossible to describe a common set of cultural values that encompass all tribal groups, most share common values of noninterference, time orientation, sharing, cooperation, coexistence with nature, and extended family structure” (Pewewardy, 118).

Being familiar with the narrative-based traditional culture of American Indian groups, storytelling, and imagery will be important. Developing language through imagination will be a way to open students to all the possibilities of language. Language, after all, is much like the circular thinking philosophy; language has relationships with theme, circumstance, usage and community. Without things to communicate about, there is no need for language. Pewewardy says, “Traditional American Indian learning focuses on process over product, legends and stories as traditional teaching paradigms, knowledge obtained from self, and cognitive development through problem-solving techniques” (Pewewardy, 119).

Lastly, as a non Indian dominated society that has dominated and crippled dynamic complex cultures, education of American Indian children has to be extra important. Language will be the building block for American Indian students to succeed. As this paper has established, American Indian learners already have a history of state enforced abuse, and poverty. Without a chance for a decent unbiased education, American Indian learners will have no footing with which to succeed in the society into which they have been forced. Paulo Freire insists “any situation in which some individuals prevent others from engaging in the process of inquiry is one of violence […] This movement of inquiry must be directed towards humanization” (Freire, 93). The United States has engaged in enough violence towards our native peoples. To promote an unbiased, learner centered, community oriented classroom will be a start in the direction of humanization, humanization not just for the benefit of American Indian learners, but for all learners.

The goal in the classroom should be towards the idea of tiyoshpaye, a community of learners helping all to learn without fear. In conclusion, Sherman Alexie sums up best when answering the question of comfort of leaving your culture behind. Alexie answers, “We’re always leaving our cultures and tribes, whether we pretend to our not” (Carrol). As Sir Francis Bacon said in 1597, knowledge is power. American Indian success in a non Indian world can be possible with education.